Learn  /  Prostate Cancer, Explained
Chapter 12

Systemic Therapy

This chapter is general patient education from the book Prostate Cancer, Explained. It is not medical advice for your specific situation. Always discuss your care with your own doctor.

Patient Story

James was 68 when he learned his prostate cancer had spread to his bones. "You need hormone therapy," his oncologist said. James felt his stomach drop. He imagined losing everything that made him feel like himself — his energy, his strength, his desire. "Will I still be me?" he asked. His doctor paused and said, "You will still be you. But some things will change, and we are going to prepare you for every one of them." Over the next two years, James learned to manage hot flashes with a simple medication, kept his bones strong with exercise and a twice-yearly injection, and found that while his body changed, his spirit did not. His story is not unusual — and the tools to manage these changes are better than ever.

Part 1: What Is Systemic Therapy and Why Is It Needed?

When doctors talk about treating prostate cancer, they often divide treatments into two categories: local treatments (surgery and radiation) that target the prostate and surrounding area, and systemic treatments (medications) that work throughout the entire body.

Systemic therapy is needed when:

The reason systemic therapy works in prostate cancer is rooted in a Nobel Prize-winning discovery from the 1940s. Doctors Charles Huggins and Clarence Hodges showed that prostate cancer depends on testosterone — the primary male hormone — to grow. Remove the testosterone, and the cancer slows or stops. This principle remains the foundation of prostate cancer treatment more than 80 years later.¹

Most testosterone (~95%) is produced in the testicles, with a small amount (~5%) made in the adrenal glands. Some prostate cancer cells can even produce their own testosterone. Modern systemic therapies target these sources at multiple levels.

📊 Illustration 12.1 — The testosterone pathway and where each drug blocks it

Part 2: Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) — The Foundation

How ADT Works

The brain controls testosterone production through a chain of signals:

  1. The hypothalamus (in the brain) releases GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone)
  2. GnRH tells the pituitary gland to release LH (luteinizing hormone) and FSH
  3. LH tells the testicles to produce testosterone
  4. Testosterone fuels prostate cancer growth

ADT interrupts this chain. The goal is to reduce testosterone to "castrate" levels — below 50 ng/dL (normal is 300–1000 ng/dL). At these low levels, most prostate cancer cells stop growing or die.²

The testosterone pathway & drug blocks
Hypothalamusreleases GnRH BLOCK: GnRH antagonistsdegarelix, relugolix Pituitary glandreleases LH & FSH OVERRIDE: LHRH agonistsleuprolide, goserelin Testicles~95% of testosterone REMOVE: orchiectomysurgical removal Adrenal glands (~5%)BLOCK: abiraterone (CYP17A1) Testosterone & DHT in bloodcirculate to the prostate Prostate cancer cell Androgen receptor (AR)binding activates growth genes BLOCK: 1st-gen antiandrogens STRONGER: next-gen ARPIs Each medication blocks a different step in the testosterone pathway.Some patients receive drugs that block several steps at once.
The hormonal signaling chain from brain to cancer cell, and where each drug intervenes.

Types of ADT

Surgical castration (bilateral orchiectomy)

This is the surgical removal of both testicles. It achieves immediate, permanent testosterone suppression — no ongoing injections or pills needed. It is equally effective as medical castration.² ³ Advantages include one-time cost, no medication adherence issues, and no testosterone flare. The main disadvantage is that it is irreversible and psychologically difficult for many men. Testicular prostheses are available for cosmetic purposes. Although rarely chosen in the United States today (fewer than 5% of men receiving ADT), it remains a valid and cost-effective option, especially in settings where medication access is limited.

LHRH agonists (the most common form of ADT)

These are injectable medications that initially stimulate, then suppress, testosterone production. They work by overwhelming the pituitary gland with constant GnRH stimulation until it stops responding — like a car alarm that eventually goes silent.

Common LHRH agonists include:

Important: the testosterone flare. During the first 1–2 weeks of LHRH agonist treatment, testosterone levels temporarily rise before they fall. This "flare" can cause problems in men with bone metastases (worsening pain, spinal cord compression) or large prostate tumors (urinary obstruction). To prevent flare-related complications, a first-generation antiandrogen (such as bicalutamide) must be given for at least 7 days before and during the first weeks of LHRH agonist therapy when bone metastases are present.²

GnRH antagonists (no flare)

These medications directly block GnRH receptors in the pituitary gland, causing an immediate drop in testosterone without any flare.

The HERO trial (622 patients on relugolix, 308 on leuprolide) demonstrated that relugolix achieved superior testosterone suppression compared to leuprolide (96.7% vs. 88.8% maintained castration through 48 weeks). Relugolix also showed a 54% lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (2.9% vs. 6.2%; HR 0.46).⁴ Testosterone recovery after stopping relugolix was also faster — mean levels of 288 ng/dL at 90 days after discontinuation versus only 59 ng/dL with leuprolide.⁴

The REVELUTION trial (2026) provided a biological explanation for this cardiovascular difference: leuprolide was associated with significantly greater coronary artery plaque progression than relugolix, driven by an increase in noncalcified (less stable) plaque.⁵

First-generation antiandrogens

These medications block the androgen receptor directly, preventing testosterone from activating cancer growth. They are typically used in combination with LHRH agonists, not alone:

📊 Illustration 12.2 — Types of ADT comparison table

📊 Illustration 12.3 — LHRH agonist vs. antagonist: the flare concept

Agonist vs. antagonist: the flare concept
LHRH agonist (leuprolide) Castrate 50 FLARE Week 0 to Week 4 GnRH antagonist (relugolix) Castrate 50 No flare Week 0 to Week 4 Flare can worsen bone pain or cause cordcompression. Antiandrogen cover is started7 days before injection when bone metsare present. No antiandrogen cover needed. Preferredwhen there is impending spinal cordcompression or symptomatic bonemetastases.
Agonists cause an early testosterone surge (flare); antagonists suppress testosterone immediately.

Part 3: When and How Long Is ADT Used?

The duration of ADT depends on the clinical situation:

With radiation for localized disease:

After surgery (adjuvant/salvage setting):

For biochemical recurrence without metastases:

For metastatic disease:

📊 Illustration 12.4 — ADT duration by risk group

How long is ADT used?
06122436 mo Favorable intermediate + RTnone or 4-6 mo Unfavorable interm. + RT High risk + EBRT alone18-36 mo High risk + EBRT + brachy~12 mo Very high risk + RT24-36 mo Salvage RT after surgery6-24 mo Biochemical recurrenceintermittent option Metastatic (mCSPC)ongoing Guidelines only — your doctor tailors duration to your situation, PSA response, and tolerance.
Typical ADT duration varies widely with risk group and treatment setting.

Part 4: Intermittent vs. Continuous ADT

What is intermittent ADT (iADT)?

Instead of staying on ADT continuously, treatment is cycled "on" and "off." ADT is started, and when PSA drops to a low level (typically ≤4 ng/mL), treatment is paused. When PSA rises again (typically ≥10–20 ng/mL), treatment is restarted. During "off" periods, testosterone partially recovers, and many side effects improve.

What does the evidence show?

A systematic review of 9 randomized trials with 5,508 patients found no significant difference in overall survival between intermittent and continuous ADT (pooled HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.94–1.11) for men with relapsing, locally advanced, or metastatic disease.⁶ Quality of life was better with intermittent ADT — particularly sexual function, physical activity, and general well-being — and medication costs were reduced by approximately 48%.⁶

For metastatic disease specifically, the evidence is less clear. The SWOG 9346 trial (1,535 patients) could not confirm that intermittent ADT was non-inferior to continuous ADT — median survival was 5.1 years with intermittent therapy versus 5.8 years with continuous therapy, and a 20% increase in the risk of death could not be ruled out.⁷

Bottom line: Intermittent ADT is a reasonable option for men with biochemical recurrence (non-metastatic disease), where it offers quality-of-life benefits without compromising survival. For metastatic disease, continuous ADT (or ADT combined with treatment intensification) is generally preferred.

📊 Illustration 12.5 — Intermittent ADT: the on/off cycle explained visually

Part 5: Side Effects of ADT — The Full Picture

This may be the most important section of this chapter. ADT affects nearly every system in the body because testosterone plays a role in many functions beyond the prostate — including bone strength, heart health, metabolism, mood, and sexual function. Understanding these side effects — and knowing they can be managed — is essential.

Side effects of ADT: a body map
Brain / headBrain fog, mood, hot flashes,fatigue ChestGynecomastia,cardiovascular risk AbdomenWeight gain, metabolicsyndrome, diabetes risk Muscles / armsMuscle loss (sarcopenia),decreased strength BonesOsteoporosis, fracture risk(+59%), joint pain Sexual / genitalsLow libido, ED, atrophy,penile shortening BloodAnemia, lipid changes,blood sugar changes LegsFatigue, weakness,clot (VTE) risk Most common Common Less common
Low testosterone affects the whole body; most effects can be prevented or managed.

A. Hot Flashes (Vasomotor Symptoms)

Hot flashes are one of the most common and bothersome side effects of ADT, affecting up to 60% of men.⁸ They can be severe, disruptive to sleep, and significantly impact quality of life.

Management options include:

Non-hormonal medications (preferred first-line):

Hormonal options (in appropriate candidates):

Non-pharmacologic approaches:

📊 Illustration 12.6 — ADT side effects: the body map

B. Sexual Dysfunction

ADT causes near-universal loss of libido and erectile dysfunction in more than 70% of men. Nocturnal and morning erections are lost. Penile and testicular size may decrease over time. PDE5 inhibitors (such as sildenafil or tadalafil) may help some men maintain erections, but they cannot restore libido. This topic is covered in detail in Chapter 15 (Survivorship).⁸

C. Body Composition Changes

ADT increases body fat by approximately 9% and decreases muscle mass (sarcopenia). Weight gain is common. The single most important intervention is resistance and aerobic exercise — this is not optional; it is a critical part of treatment. Studies consistently show that structured exercise programs reduce fat gain, preserve muscle, improve fatigue, and enhance quality of life in men on ADT.⁸

D. Bone Health

ADT significantly increases the risk of osteoporosis and fractures. A large meta-analysis found ADT was associated with a 59% increased risk of bone fractures (HR 1.59) and a 173% increased risk of osteoporosis (HR 2.73).⁸

Prevention and management:

E. Cardiovascular and Metabolic Effects

ADT increases the risk of diabetes, coronary heart disease, and metabolic syndrome. The cardiovascular risk may be highest in the first 6 months of treatment.⁸

GnRH antagonists (relugolix, degarelix) may have a lower cardiovascular risk than LHRH agonists. The HERO trial showed a 54% lower rate of major cardiovascular events with relugolix compared to leuprolide.⁴ The REVELUTION trial (2026) provided a biological explanation: leuprolide was associated with significantly greater coronary artery plaque progression, driven by noncalcified (less stable) plaque.⁵

Cardiovascular prevention — the ABCDEs:

Cardio-oncology referral should be considered for patients at elevated cardiovascular risk.

F. Cognitive and Emotional Effects

Depression, mood swings, fatigue, and sleep disturbance are common. Cognitive dysfunction has been reported but remains controversial. Fatigue is one of the most frequent complaints and often improves with exercise.⁸

G. Gynecomastia (Breast Enlargement)

Breast tissue growth occurs in approximately 10% of men on ADT, and is more common with antiandrogens such as bicalutamide (up to 70% with bicalutamide monotherapy).⁸

Prevention and treatment:

H. Other Effects

📊 Illustration 12.7 — Managing ADT side effects: practical strategies table

Part 6: Next-Generation Hormonal Agents (ARPIs)

Traditional ADT reduces testosterone production, but cancer cells can still find ways to use tiny amounts of remaining androgens. Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors (ARPIs) are more powerful drugs that either block the androgen receptor more completely or shut down androgen production at additional sites (including within the tumor itself).

A. Abiraterone (Zytiga)

Abiraterone blocks an enzyme called CYP17A1, which is needed to produce androgens in the adrenal glands, testes, and within the tumor itself. It must be taken with a low-dose steroid (prednisone or methylprednisolone) to prevent side effects from cortisol disruption.

B. Enzalutamide (Xtandi)

Enzalutamide blocks the androgen receptor directly — it prevents testosterone from entering the cell nucleus and activating cancer growth genes.

C. Apalutamide (Erleada)

Similar mechanism to enzalutamide.

D. Darolutamide (Nubeqa)

Similar mechanism but may cross the blood-brain barrier less than enzalutamide or apalutamide, potentially causing fewer central nervous system side effects (fatigue, cognitive changes, seizures).

When Are ARPIs Used?

ARPIs have transformed prostate cancer treatment and are now used across multiple disease states:

Important: Cross-resistance exists between ARPIs. Switching from one ARPI to another (for example, from abiraterone to enzalutamide) generally provides limited benefit. This is why the NCCN recommends docetaxel as the preferred next step after an ARPI fails, rather than switching to a different ARPI.¹⁸

📊 Illustration 12.8 — ARPI comparison table

Part 7: Chemotherapy

Chemotherapy uses drugs that kill rapidly dividing cells. Unlike hormone therapy, which starves the cancer of testosterone, chemotherapy directly damages the cancer cell's ability to divide and grow.

A. Docetaxel (Taxotere)

Docetaxel was the first chemotherapy to show a survival benefit in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (2004). It works by disrupting microtubules — the internal scaffolding that cells need to divide.

B. Cabazitaxel (Jevtana)

Cabazitaxel is a second-generation taxane designed to work even when cancer cells have become resistant to docetaxel.

C. Cabazitaxel + Carboplatin

For aggressive variant mCRPC — defined by visceral metastases, low PSA with bulky disease, high LDH, neuroendocrine features, or unfavorable genomics (defects in at least 2 of PTEN, TP53, and RB1). This combination requires growth factor support and is reserved for fit patients.¹⁸

D. Mitoxantrone

Mitoxantrone with prednisone may provide symptom relief (palliation) but has NOT been shown to extend survival. It is reserved for patients who cannot tolerate other therapies.¹⁸

📊 Illustration 12.9 — Chemotherapy: what to expect

Part 8: Immunotherapy

A. Sipuleucel-T (Provenge)

Sipuleucel-T holds a special place in cancer history — it was the first FDA-approved immunotherapy for any cancer (2010).²³

How it works: Sipuleucel-T is made from your own immune cells. The process involves three steps, repeated three times over about one month:

  1. Leukapheresis: Your blood is drawn through a special machine that collects white blood cells (similar to donating blood, but takes 3–4 hours).
  2. Laboratory processing: Your cells are sent to a manufacturing facility where they are "trained" to recognize a protein found on prostate cancer cells (prostatic acid phosphatase, or PAP).
  3. Infusion: The activated cells are infused back into your bloodstream through an IV, where they seek out and attack cancer cells.

The IMPACT trial (512 patients) showed that sipuleucel-T reduced the risk of death by 22% compared to placebo. Median survival improved by 4.1 months (25.8 months vs. 21.7 months; HR 0.78; P = 0.03). The 3-year survival rate was 31.7% versus 23.0%.²³ ²⁴

Important points:

How sipuleucel-T works
Step 1Collection LeukapheresisWhite blood cells arecollected (~3-4 hrs) Step 2Processing Lab activationCells trained to recognizecancer (~3 days) Step 3Infusion Return to bodyTrained cells infused backto fight cancer (~1 hr) Repeated 3 times, about 2 weeks apart (total treatment ~1 month) Sipuleucel-T does NOT lower PSA — do not judge it by PSA alone.The IMPACT trial showed a 4.1-month survival benefit despite no PSA change.
Your own immune cells are collected, trained against cancer, and returned in a three-step cycle.

B. Pembrolizumab (Keytruda)

Pembrolizumab is a checkpoint inhibitor — it "releases the brakes" on the immune system, allowing T cells to attack cancer cells more effectively.

📊 Illustration 12.10 — How sipuleucel-T works

Part 9: Targeted Therapy — PARP Inhibitors

PARP inhibitors represent a new era of precision medicine in prostate cancer — treatments chosen based on the specific genetic makeup of your tumor.

How They Work

Every cell in your body has systems to repair damaged DNA. One important repair system is called homologous recombination repair (HRR). Genes like BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, and others are essential for this system to work.

When a cancer cell has a mutation in one of these HRR genes, its DNA repair is already weakened. PARP is another DNA repair enzyme that serves as a "backup" system. PARP inhibitors block this backup, leaving the cancer cell with no way to fix its DNA — leading to cell death. Think of it as "kicking them while they're down."²⁸

Normal cells still have one working copy of the HRR gene, so they can survive. This is why PARP inhibitors preferentially kill cancer cells with HRR mutations while sparing normal tissue.

Who Benefits?

Approximately 20% of men with metastatic prostate cancer have alterations in DNA repair genes. The response to PARP inhibitors follows a clear hierarchy:²⁸ ²⁹

FDA-Approved PARP Inhibitors for Prostate Cancer

The NCCN Guidelines list the following approved options:²⁸

ASCO guidelines recommend HRR testing prior to initiation of systemic therapy for mCRPC. For patients with BRCA1/2 alterations, preferred first-line options include niraparib + abiraterone, olaparib + abiraterone, or talazoparib + enzalutamide.³¹

Side effects of PARP inhibitors: fatigue, nausea, anemia (may require transfusions), low platelets, low white blood cells. Regular blood count monitoring is essential.²⁸

The key message: Genetic testing (both germline and somatic/tumor) is recommended for all patients with metastatic or castration-resistant prostate cancer. If you have not been tested, ask your doctor.²⁸

📊 Illustration 12.11 — PARP inhibitor table

Part 10: Radiopharmaceuticals — Radioactive Medicines

Radiopharmaceuticals are a unique category of treatment — they are radioactive drugs injected into the bloodstream that seek out and destroy cancer cells from the inside. Unlike external radiation therapy (which aims beams at the body from outside), these drugs travel through the blood and deliver radiation directly to cancer cells wherever they are.

A. Radium-223 (Xofigo)

Radium-223 is a radioactive form of radium that mimics calcium. Because bone metastases from prostate cancer are "osteoblastic" (they stimulate new bone formation), radium-223 is naturally attracted to these areas of rapid bone turnover. Once there, it emits alpha particles — tiny, powerful bursts of radiation that kill nearby cancer cells while causing minimal damage to surrounding tissue (alpha particles travel less than 100 micrometers, or about 10 cell diameters).³²

The ALSYMPCA trial showed that radium-223 improved overall survival by 3.6 months compared to placebo in men with symptomatic bone-predominant mCRPC (median OS 14.9 vs. 11.3 months; HR 0.70; P .001).³²

The PEACE-3 trial (2025–2026) demonstrated that combining radium-223 with enzalutamide significantly improved both radiographic progression-free survival (19.4 vs. 16.4 months; HR 0.69) and overall survival (median 38.2 vs. 32.6 months; HR 0.76; P = 0.0096) as first-line therapy for mCRPC with bone metastases. This represents a ~6-month survival advantage for the combination.³³ ³⁴

Key points:

B. Lutetium-177 PSMA-617 (Pluvicto)

Lu-177 PSMA-617 represents the cutting edge of prostate cancer treatment — a concept called "theranostics" (therapy + diagnostics). The same molecule (PSMA) used to find cancer on a PET scan is used to deliver radiation treatment directly to cancer cells.

How it works: PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen) is a protein found on the surface of most prostate cancer cells. Lu-177 PSMA-617 is a radioactive molecule that binds to PSMA, delivering beta-particle radiation directly to cancer cells and the surrounding tumor microenvironment.³⁵

The VISION trial (831 patients) showed that adding Lu-177 PSMA-617 to standard of care improved overall survival by 4 months (15.3 vs. 11.3 months; HR 0.62; P .001) in men with PSMA-positive mCRPC who had received at least one ARPI and one or two taxanes.³⁵ ³⁶

The PSMAfore trial (468 patients) extended the evidence to the pre-chemotherapy setting: Lu-177 PSMA-617 significantly prolonged radiographic progression-free survival compared to switching ARPIs (11.6 vs. 5.6 months; HR 0.49) in taxane-naive patients. Quality of life was better preserved, and symptomatic skeletal events were delayed.³⁷ ³⁸

Key points:

📊 Illustration 12.12 — How radiopharmaceuticals work

Part 11: Bone-Protective Agents (for Metastatic Disease)

This section is separate from the osteoporosis prevention discussed in Part 5D. Here, we are talking about patients who already have bone metastases — the goal is to prevent skeletal complications such as fractures, spinal cord compression, and the need for bone surgery or radiation.

Two options:

Both require:

📊 Illustration 12.13 — Bone protection: two different situations, two different doses

Part 12: What to Expect at Your First ADT Injection

Many men are anxious about their first hormone therapy injection. Here is what to expect:

Before the appointment:

At the appointment:

After the injection:

Ongoing monitoring:

Part 13: Treatment Sequencing — The Big Picture

The landscape of systemic therapy for prostate cancer is complex and constantly evolving. One of the most important concepts to understand is that what you received first affects what works next.

Key principles:

📊 Illustration 12.14 — Treatment sequencing flowchart

Treatment sequencing in advanced disease
Metastatic castration-sensitive (mCSPC)ADT + intensification: ARPI, docetaxel,or triplet (ARPI + docetaxel) for high volume progresses despite castrate T Castration-resistant (CRPC)nmCRPC: add an ARPI · mCRPC: continue below First-line mCRPC — guided by prior therapy & biomarkersPrior ARPI → docetaxel · Prior docetaxel → ARPIthen match a targeted option below BRCA / HRRPARP inhibitor MSI-H / dMMRpembrolizumab PSMA-positiveLu-177 PSMA-617 Bone-onlyradium-223 Second-line mCRPC and beyondCabazitaxel · radiopharmaceuticals · clinical trials Key principle: what you receive first affects what works next. At every stage: palliative care, bone protection, exercise, and quality-of-life support.
Treatment moves through stages; biomarkers and prior therapy guide each next choice.

Part 14: Research Frontiers

The future of systemic therapy for prostate cancer is exciting. Here are some of the most promising areas of research:

Myth vs. Fact

Myth: "Hormone therapy will turn me into a woman."

Fact: ADT reduces testosterone but does not feminize you. You remain male. Some body changes occur (less body hair, possible breast tenderness, changes in fat distribution), but these are manageable and do not change who you are.

Myth: "Chemotherapy is always a last resort."

Fact: Docetaxel is now used early — in combination with ADT and ARPIs — for metastatic castration-sensitive disease. Starting chemotherapy early, when you are stronger, often leads to better outcomes than waiting until the cancer is resistant to hormones.²⁰ ²¹

Myth: "If my PSA doesn't drop, the treatment isn't working."

Fact: Sipuleucel-T improves survival by 4.1 months without lowering PSA. PSA is an important marker, but it is not the only measure of treatment success. Some treatments work by slowing cancer growth or activating the immune system in ways that PSA does not capture.²³ ²⁴

Myth: "Once I start hormone therapy, I can never stop."

Fact: Intermittent ADT — cycling treatment on and off — is a valid option for men with biochemical recurrence. During "off" periods, testosterone partially recovers, and many side effects improve. Multiple trials show no survival difference compared to continuous ADT in the non-metastatic setting.⁶

Myth: "PARP inhibitors work for everyone with prostate cancer."

Fact: PARP inhibitors work best for patients with specific genetic mutations, especially BRCA2. Only about 20% of men with metastatic prostate cancer carry these mutations. Genetic testing is essential to determine eligibility.²⁸ ²⁹

Myth: "Radium-223 and Pluvicto are the same thing."

Fact: They are very different. Radium-223 targets bone (it mimics calcium and goes to areas of bone turnover). Lu-177 PSMA-617 (Pluvicto) targets PSMA protein on cancer cells anywhere in the body. They are used in different clinical situations and have different eligibility requirements.³² ³⁵

Myth: "ADT side effects are inevitable and untreatable."

Fact: While ADT does cause side effects, most can be prevented or significantly reduced with proactive strategies — exercise, bone-protective agents, cardiovascular monitoring, medications for hot flashes, and psychological support. The key is planning ahead, not reacting after problems develop.⁸ ⁹

Myth: "If the cancer becomes castration-resistant, there is nothing left to do."

Fact: Castration-resistant does not mean treatment-resistant. There are now more than a dozen FDA-approved treatments for castration-resistant prostate cancer, including next-generation hormonal agents, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, PARP inhibitors, and radiopharmaceuticals. Many men live years with well-managed castration-resistant disease.¹⁸

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

About hormone therapy:

  1. Why do I need systemic therapy? What is the goal — cure, long-term control, or symptom relief?
  2. Which type of ADT do you recommend (LHRH agonist, GnRH antagonist, or orchiectomy) and why?
  3. Should I receive a GnRH antagonist (relugolix or degarelix) instead of an LHRH agonist, especially given my cardiovascular history?
  4. How long will I be on hormone therapy?
  5. Is intermittent ADT an option for me?
  6. Do I need a next-generation hormonal agent (ARPI) in addition to ADT?

About side effects and monitoring:

  1. What side effects should I expect, and how can we prevent or manage them before they start?
  2. Should I have a DEXA scan and cardiovascular risk assessment before starting ADT?
  3. Should I see a cardiologist or endocrinologist while on ADT?
  4. What exercise program do you recommend while I am on treatment?
  5. How often will you check my testosterone level to make sure it is adequately suppressed?

About advanced treatments:

  1. Has my tumor been tested for genetic mutations (BRCA, MSI-H, HRR genes)?
  2. Am I a candidate for immunotherapy, PARP inhibitors, or radiopharmaceuticals?
  3. Is a PSMA PET scan appropriate for me?
  4. What is the plan if this treatment stops working? What comes next?

About the big picture:

  1. Are there clinical trials I should consider?
  2. What can I do to stay as healthy as possible while on treatment — diet, exercise, bone health, heart health?
  3. Should I be referred to a palliative care team for symptom management and quality of life support?

Key Takeaways

Support Resources

Patient advocacy and education:

Clinical trials:

Bone health:

Cardiovascular health:

Financial assistance:

Mental health and emotional support:

References

  1. 1. Huggins C, Hodges CV. Studies on prostatic cancer: I. The effect of castration, of estrogen and of androgen injection on serum phosphatases in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer Res. 1941;1(4):293-297.
  2. 2. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Prostate Cancer. Version 5.2026. National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
  3. 3. Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2024.
  4. 4. Shore ND, Saad F, Cookson MS, et al. Oral relugolix for androgen-deprivation therapy in advanced prostate cancer (HERO). N Engl J Med. 2020;382(23):2187-2196.
  5. 5. Abufaraj M, et al. REVELUTION: Coronary artery plaque progression with relugolix versus leuprolide in patients with prostate cancer. Presented at AUA 2026.
  6. 6. Hussain M, Tangen CM, Berry DL, et al. Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(14):1314-1325.
  7. 7. Magnan S, Zarychanski R, Pilote L, et al. Intermittent vs continuous androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(9):1261-1269.
  8. 8. Nguyen PL, Alibhai SM, Basaria S, et al. Adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy and strategies to mitigate them. Eur Urol. 2015;67(5):825-836.
  9. 9. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Survivorship — Hormone-Related Symptoms. Version 2.2026.
  10. 10. Loprinzi CL, et al. Management of hot flashes in cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2024.
  11. 11. Morrow GR, et al. Oxybutynin for ADT-related hot flashes: Alliance A222001 randomized trial. Presented at ASCO GU 2026.
  12. 12. Cummings SR, et al. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(8):756-765.
  13. 13. de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, Molina A, et al. Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(21):1995-2005.
  14. 14. Hussain M, Fizazi K, Saad F, et al. Enzalutamide in men with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (PROSPER). N Engl J Med. 2018;378(26):2465-2474.
  15. 15. Smith MR, Saad F, Chowdhury S, et al. Apalutamide treatment and metastasis-free survival in prostate cancer (SPARTAN). N Engl J Med. 2018;378(15):1408-1418.
  16. 16. Smith MR, Hussain M, Saad F, et al. Darolutamide and survival in metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (ARASENS). N Engl J Med. 2022;386(12):1132-1142.
  17. 17. Fizazi K, Tran N, Fein L, et al. Abiraterone plus prednisone in metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer (LATITUDE). N Engl J Med. 2017;377(4):352-360.
  18. 18. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Prostate Cancer — Principles of Non-Hormonal Systemic Therapy. Version 5.2026.
  19. 19. Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer (TAX 327). N Engl J Med. 2004;351(15):1502-1512.
  20. 20. Sweeney CJ, Chen YH, Carducci M, et al. Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (CHAARTED). N Engl J Med. 2015;373(8):737-746.
  21. 21. Vale CL, Burdett S, Rydzewska LH, et al. Addition of docetaxel or bisphosphonates to standard of care in men with localised or metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analyses of aggregate data. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(2):243-256.
  22. 22. de Wit R, de Bono J, Sternberg CN, et al. Cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer (CARD). N Engl J Med. 2019;381(26):2506-2518.
  23. 23. Kantoff PW, Higano CS, Shore ND, et al. Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer (IMPACT). N Engl J Med. 2010;363(5):411-422.
  24. 24. Higano CS, Schellhammer PF, Small EJ, et al. Integrated data from 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials of active cellular immunotherapy with sipuleucel-T in advanced prostate cancer. Cancer. 2009;115(16):3670-3679.
  25. 25. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Prostate Cancer — Systemic Therapy for M1 CRPC. Version 5.2026.
  26. 26. Schellhammer PF, Chodak G, Whitmore JB, et al. Lower baseline prostate-specific antigen is associated with a greater overall survival benefit from sipuleucel-T in the IMPACT trial. Urology. 2013;81(6):1297-1302.
  27. 27. Fizazi K, et al. Pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (KEYNOTE-641). J Clin Oncol. 2024.
  28. 28. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Prostate Cancer — Principles of PARP Inhibitors. Version 5.2026.
  29. 29. de Bono J, Mateo J, Fizazi K, et al. Olaparib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PROfound). N Engl J Med. 2020;382(22):2091-2102.
  30. 30. Agarwal N, Azad AA, Carles J, et al. Talazoparib plus enzalutamide in men with first-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TALAPRO-2). Lancet. 2023;402(10398):291-303.
  31. 31. Mohler JL, et al. ASCO Guideline: Management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2024.
  32. 32. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Prostate Cancer — Principles of Radiopharmaceuticals. Version 5.2026.
  33. 33. Fizazi K, et al. Radium-223 plus enzalutamide in bone-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PEACE-3). Lancet. 2025.
  34. 34. Fizazi K, et al. PEACE-3 updated overall survival analysis. Presented at ASCO GU 2026.
  35. 35. Sartor O, de Bono J, Chi KN, et al. Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (VISION). N Engl J Med. 2021;385(12):1091-1103.
  36. 36. Morris MJ, et al. VISION trial updated analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2023.
  37. 37. Emmett L, et al. Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 versus change of androgen receptor pathway inhibitor therapy for taxane-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PSMAfore). Lancet. 2024.
  38. 38. Herrmann K, et al. PSMAfore updated results. J Nucl Med. 2025.
  39. 39. Fizazi K, Carducci M, Smith M, et al. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Lancet. 2011;377(9768):813-822.
  40. 40. Khreish F, et al. AlphaBet trial: combination Lu-177 PSMA + radium-223 in mCRPC. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025.
  41. 41. Gulley JL, et al. Combination immunotherapy approaches in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2024.